Carolyn Guertin’s Authorship 2.0: Writing Digital Culture
As scholars in an English Department, we think we know what authorship is. In this course, we will be rethinking the basic tenets of texts and authors as they exist and are evolving in a digital age. This means that we need to explore and redefine what reading, writing, viewing, and their related tools, platforms, and skills (including books, screens, literacies, markup, content, data, etc.) are in the present moment. This course will be transdisciplinary and should be of interest to anyone who works or wants to work in the fields of reading, writing, publishing, multimedia, critical thinking and creative production. Key authorship topics that we will explore and experiment in will include creativity and copyright, downloading and uploading, remixing, the globalization of information, identity, commodifiction, tactical media, markup, spatialization, visualization and augmentation. The political issues we will grapple with will include identity formation in a global age, citizenship, ethics, intellectual property rights, consumerism, disobedience, and consumerism. From the interactivity of the 70s to the participatory culture of the social media revolution to the mobilization of occupiers via mobile media, we will explore how citizens write and write themselves into culture in a digital age.
I’d be happy to review it if there’s still a call out for reviewers. Besides posting it on my course blog and/or my personal blog I could hunt down a decent user-submitted content site, and post a short form review to Good Reads.
I’m still researching more options, but two venues that stand out to me at present are New Media and Society (I could contact Book Review editor David Park after I got the go ahead from you two) and a non-journal but still highly academic venue: The Sociological Images blog.
500 words tends to be the maximum amount of words allowed for a post there, but a submission could focus on the essential heart of one chapter and its findings as long as there were some good visuals to accompany it. Themes related to sexuality, gender, race and the occupy movement go over well there.
Just caught this tonight.
I’d be happy to review it if there’s still a call out for reviewers. Besides posting it on my course blog and/or my personal blog I could hunt down a decent user-submitted content site, and post a short form review to Good Reads.
Do you think that you might suggest a journal where you could review it?
I’m still researching more options, but two venues that stand out to me at present are New Media and Society (I could contact Book Review editor David Park after I got the go ahead from you two) and a non-journal but still highly academic venue: The Sociological Images blog.
They’ll take an occasional book-based post from an academic structured a lot like this one:
http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/05/23/the-racialization-of-mental-illness/
500 words tends to be the maximum amount of words allowed for a post there, but a submission could focus on the essential heart of one chapter and its findings as long as there were some good visuals to accompany it. Themes related to sexuality, gender, race and the occupy movement go over well there.
Can you send me your email please Kate (backchannel)? I’m carolyn dot guertin at gmail dot com.
cg