The U.S. National Science Foundation showed its support for research data per se in a press release about the Research Data Alliance (RDA). The RDA is a new organization with an open structure–still not heavily populated yet–for researchers and data professionals to come together in comment boards and occasional face-to-face meetings. When it finally gets going it should be a nice complement to IASSIST.
As HASTAC heralds a forum (the HASTAC way) on “A Bill of Rights and Principles for Learning in the Digital Age,” which calls for access, contribution from all over the world, and “pedagogical transparency” (students should know the background and outcomes of educational objects in advance), the open spirit represented therein calls to mind Lawrence Lessig’s advocacy of more reasonable copyright laws to support rapidly produced multimedia conglomerations. At this time, we are still waiting to hear if the two streams are finding each other.
People are starting to consider Twitter less novel and constrained (the 140-character limit) and more navigable (helped by things like Tweetdeck), as reported in econtentmag (“Twitter comes of age“). Gerry McKiernan, engineering librarian at Iowa State University, is a prolific commentator and announced years ago [citation being sought] that he was moving from list posts to blogs, and then using Twitter as his medium of choice. It still isn’t as organizable as e-mail, but certainly it’s getting too popular not to check regularly, even for scholarly information as academics announce their latest publications or ideas.
Econtentmag reports that “some organizations are beginning to question the wisdom of giving up ownership of their data through these sites and are considering hosting networks via their own on-domain sites (“Wrestling social network control away from the big guys,” Econtentmag 7 January 2013). YouTube is not mentioned, but use of it to host video libraries of individuals (faculty members as well as consumers) and small organizations (labs), sometimes in the form of “channels“.
There has been a fair amount of grantees publishing in Open Access venues (actually, the requirement is to submit copies of all published papers to PubMed Central), but there are still holdbacks–investigators who publish in journals that are not OA. Insofar as OA journals are not always considered to be at the top of their fields (although some are quite prestigious), that would be understandable to career-minded academic; there also has been pushback from Congress to benefit large for-profit publishers (see Research Works Act down for now). This notice (given by NIH, as mentioned in Research USA) shows that NIH is not backing down.